Beyond Reality: The Unexpected Role of Imaginary Numbers in Science and Physics, a Veritasium Perspective

Inspired by Veritasium, explore the fascinating journey of imaginary numbers, born from mathematical curiosity in the 16th century, and their surprising fundamental importance in fields like physics, particularly quantum mechanics.

Discover the story of imaginary numbers, from their initial dismissal as unreal to their indispensable role in modern science and physics, especially in understanding the quantum world, presented through a Veritasium lens.................................

Inspired by Veritasium, discover how imaginary numbers, born in the 16th century, became essential to physics and quantum mechanics.

Mathematics, at its inception, served as a tool to quantify the tangible world – measuring land, predicting celestial movements, and managing commerce. Yet, the pursuit of mathematical understanding often leads to realms beyond our immediate sensory experience. One such journey involves the development of imaginary numbers. In the 16th century, mathematicians like Gerolamo Cardano and Rafael Bombelli grappled with solving cubic equations, encountering solutions that involved the square roots of negative numbers. Initially viewed with suspicion, these numbers, with the square root of -1 often denoted as 'i', were labeled "sophistic" or "reducible roots," their nature not fully grasped. René Descartes later coined the term "imaginary," reflecting their perceived unreality. However, as the rules for manipulating these seemingly abstract entities were developed, their profound practical applications, particularly within the domains of electrical engineering and, most strikingly, quantum physics, propelled them from the fringes of mathematical thought to a position of fundamental importance in modern science. This exploration, inspired by the insightful approach of Veritasium, will trace the intriguing evolution of imaginary numbers and their unexpected connection to our deepest understanding of the universe.

The Genesis: Solving the Cubic and Encountering the "Impossible"

The story of imaginary numbers intertwines with the historical quest to solve polynomial equations, specifically the cubic equation. In 1494, Luca Pacioli, Leonardo da Vinci's mathematics tutor, in his comprehensive work "Summa de Arithmetica," concluded that a general solution to the cubic equation was impossible. This assertion might seem surprising given that the quadratic equation had been solved by ancient civilizations millennia earlier. Their geometric approaches, while visually intuitive for non-negative solutions, lacked the completeness to encompass the full spectrum of algebraic solutions, including negative ones, which were often disregarded as nonsensical in the context of real-world measurements.

The 16th century witnessed a breakthrough. Scipione del Ferro, a mathematics professor at the University of Bologna, around 1510, discovered a method to solve a specific type of cubic equation known as the "depressed cubic" (lacking the squared term). However, in an era where mathematical prowess often determined one's professional standing through public challenges, del Ferro kept his discovery secret, sharing it only on his deathbed with his student Antonio Fior.

Fior, emboldened by this inherited knowledge, publicly boasted of his ability to solve the depressed cubic, leading to a mathematical duel in 1535 with Niccolo Fontana Tartaglia. Tartaglia, self-taught and resilient, not only solved all of Fior's thirty depressed cubic problems in a mere two hours but, in the process, independently rediscovered the general solution to the depressed cubic. His method, rooted in extending the geometric concept of "completing the square" into three dimensions, provided a way to systematically find the roots of these equations.

Cardano's "Ars Magna" and the Emergence of the Imaginary

Tartaglia's triumph drew the attention of Gerolamo Cardano, a renowned polymath from Milan, who persistently sought to learn Tartaglia's secret. Through a mix of flattery and pressure, Cardano eventually persuaded Tartaglia to reveal his method, under a strict oath of secrecy. However, Cardano, driven by his own intellectual curiosity and ambition to solve the general cubic equation (including the squared term), built upon Tartaglia's work and achieved this broader solution.

Cardano, upon discovering that any general cubic could be transformed into a depressed cubic, felt compelled to publish his findings. Despite his oath to Tartaglia, Cardano, upon learning that del Ferro's original solution predated Tartaglia's, included the general solution to the cubic in his groundbreaking 1545 work, "Ars Magna," crediting both del Ferro and Tartaglia. This act ignited a bitter dispute, but "Ars Magna" itself was a monumental achievement, pushing the boundaries of algebraic understanding.

It was within the exploration of certain cubic equations that Cardano encountered a peculiar phenomenon. When applying his algorithm to equations like $x^3=15x+4$, the solution process led to expressions involving the square roots of negative numbers, even though a real solution ($x=4$) was readily apparent through simple substitution. Cardano, perplexed by these "subtle as they are useless" quantities, initially dismissed them.

Bombelli's Bold Step: Giving Form to the "Unreal"

About a decade later, the Italian engineer Rafael Bombelli took up where Cardano left off. Unlike his predecessors, Bombelli was not deterred by the appearance of −1

​ and the seemingly nonsensical geometry it implied. He boldly decided to treat the square root of a negative number as a new kind of number, distinct from both positive and negative reals.

Bombelli hypothesized that the terms in Cardano's solution, which contained these square roots of negatives, could be expressed as a combination of a regular number and this new type of number involving −1

​. Through this ingenious assumption, Bombelli demonstrated that the seemingly problematic square roots would, in fact, cancel out during the final steps of the calculation, yielding the correct real solution. This was a pivotal moment, suggesting that these "imaginary" quantities, though lacking a direct geometric interpretation in the traditional sense, could serve as essential intermediaries in solving real-world problems.

Over the subsequent century, the landscape of mathematics underwent a significant transformation. François Viète introduced modern symbolic notation, liberating algebra from its reliance on geometric descriptions. René Descartes extensively used these "square roots of negatives," popularizing them despite coining the dismissive term "imaginary." It was Leonhard Euler who later introduced the now-standard notation 'i' to represent −1

​. When combined with real numbers, these imaginary units formed complex numbers, expanding the number system and the power of algebraic methods.

From Mathematical Curiosity to the Heart of Physics

The journey of imaginary numbers, from their emergence as a seemingly paradoxical byproduct of solving cubic equations to their eventual integration into the fabric of mathematics, is a testament to the often-unforeseen pathways of intellectual exploration. However, their story takes an even more surprising turn when we consider their role in the realm of physics.

In 1925, Erwin Schrödinger, in his quest to formulate a wave equation governing the behavior of quantum particles, building upon Louis de Broglie's concept of wave-particle duality, arrived at one of the most fundamental equations in all of science: the Schrödinger equation. Remarkably, at the very heart of this equation lies 'i', the square root of negative one.

Initially, physicists, including Schrödinger himself, felt uneasy about the presence of an imaginary number in such a fundamental description of reality. Schrödinger even mused about the wave function being fundamentally real. So, why did a mathematical concept born from an algebraic puzzle turn out to be so crucial in describing the quantum world?

The answer lies in the unique mathematical properties of imaginary numbers, particularly their behavior in the complex plane. Imaginary numbers can be visualized on an axis perpendicular to the real number line, forming the complex plane. Multiplication by 'i' corresponds to a 90-degree rotation in this plane.

Consider the feature eix. As 'x' varies along the real axis, this function traces a spiral in the complex plane. Its real part corresponds to a cosine wave, and its imaginary part to a sine wave – the quintessential functions describing wave phenomena in physics. When Schrödinger sought a mathematical form to represent the wave-like nature of particles, the exponential function with an imaginary exponent, ei(kx−ωt), naturally arose. Its derivatives are proportional to itself, a useful property for linear differential equations like the Schrödinger equation. Furthermore, superpositions of such wave solutions can describe any arbitrary wave shape.

As physicist Freeman Dyson later eloquently noted, introducing the square root of minus one into the equation transformed it from something akin to a heat conduction equation into a true wave equation, yielding solutions that beautifully corresponded to the quantized orbits of the Bohr model of the atom. The Schrödinger equation, built upon the seemingly "unreal" concept of imaginary numbers, accurately describes everything we know about the behavior of atoms, forming the foundation of modern chemistry and much of physics.

The inclusion of 'i' in the Schrödinger equation suggests a profound truth: nature, at its most fundamental level, appears to operate with complex numbers, not just real numbers. This realization was a complete surprise, highlighting how abstract mathematical constructs, initially developed out of pure curiosity, can unexpectedly become essential tools for understanding the deepest workings of the universe. The journey of imaginary numbers, from a quirky solution to a 16th-century algebraic problem to an indispensable component of 21st-century physics, underscores the remarkable and often unpredictable interplay between mathematics and our comprehension of reality, a theme often explored with captivating clarity by Veritasium.

Frequently Asked Questions: Understanding Imaginary Numbers

Q: Who invented imaginary numbers? 

A: Imaginary numbers weren't invented by one person. Their necessity arose in the 16th century when mathematicians like Gerolamo Cardano and Rafael Bombelli encountered the square roots of negative numbers while solving cubic equations.

Q: Why are imaginary numbers called "imaginary"? 

A: The term "imaginary" was coined by René Descartes, who viewed them as "unreal" because they don't directly correspond to quantities on the real number line. Despite the name, they are a valid and important mathematical concept.

Q: How are imaginary numbers used in science and physics?

A: While seemingly abstract, imaginary numbers are crucial in various scientific fields, particularly in physics. They are fundamental in quantum mechanics (e.g., the Schrödinger equation) and are also used in electrical engineering and signal processing.

Q: Are imaginary numbers "real" in a scientific sense? 

A: Yes, despite their name, imaginary numbers are essential for accurately describing many aspects of reality in science and physics. For example, quantum mechanics, our best theory of the atomic and subatomic world, is formulated using complex numbers (which include imaginary parts).

Let me know if you'd like more SEO-friendly FAQs!